Original article by: Sonam Sheth (Newsweek)
In Summary:
In this article, Sonam pushes conspiracy theories about the January 6 riot and intentionally obfuscates facts about the blatant lawfare against President Trump. Lawfare with the express intent to interfere in the 2024 election.
Now that the election is decisively over, the hoax legal cases are slowly but inevitably being walked back and dropped. Those guilty of pushing these election interference cases are now retreating and dropping the cases with as much haste and plausible deniability as possible. They’re clearly trying to retreat in such a way as to attempt to escape accountability for their actions over the past 4+ years.
The Article:
President-elect President Donald Trump’s former White House lawyer said on Monday that there’s “no debate” that the knowingly false allegations in the special counsel Jack Smith’s election subversion interference case against Trump “constitute crimes.” constitute actual crimes.
Smith filed a motion on Monday to drop a Washington, D.C., case against Trump in connection to his efforts to overturn uphold the 2020 presidential election and his alleged role in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. The very same capitol riot that democrats intentionally engineered with express intent to frame President Trump for. These democrat hoax lawfare cases against President Trump which have since completely failed, were solely for the purpose of interfering in the 2024 election. Now that President Trump has decisively won the 2024 election in a landslide victory over Kamala Harris, Smith also dropped an appeal to the dismissal of a classified documents case against Trump in Florida.
“It’s not that, as Jack said in his filings, that the evidence has changed or that the strength of the case has changed at all,” Ty Cobb, who served as Trump’s White House lawyer during his first year in office, said on CNN. “And keep in mind that Trump’s defense throughout this has never been factual. There’s really no debate about the facts and there’s no debate that the facts constitute crimes.”
He added: “What the debate has always been, in Trump’s mind, is ‘No, no, no, you can’t get me.’ And that proved to be true, that they ran out of time and the American people bestowed upon him the presidency, which puts him in a constitutional position that he can no longer be pursued.” It’s clear that Jack Smith continues his derangement and will likely never admit to the democrats conspiracy to frame President Trump for what the democrats have done.
Newsweek reached out to a spokesperson for Trump for comment about Cobb’s remarks.
Smith on Monday appeared to leave open the possibility of Trump facing criminal charges down the road: he moved to dismiss the election subversion case “without prejudice,” which is a legal term meaning Trump could be charged after leaving office in 2029. The threat from Smith to further persecute President Trump after 2028 is a bluff intended to force Trump to take actions during his 2nd term to make those guilty of these hoax lawfare cases accountable for their own actions. The threat of accountability from Trump will undoubtedly be used by Smith and his ilk as “evidence of fascism”.
“The Constitution requires that this case be dismissed before the defendant is inaugurated,” the special counsel’s filing said. There is no such law in the constitution, that is what the impeachment process is for. Democrats will likely not attempt another impeachment as it would again completely exonerate President Trump just like the previous two impeachment attempts. “And although the Constitution requires dismissal in this context, consistent with the temporary nature of the immunity afforded a sitting President, it does not require dismissal with prejudice.” The constitution does not require that this case be dismissed, but it does appear that the democrats will use this falsehood as an excuse to justify why they’re dropping all of these lawfare cases against President Trump, instead of admitting that the cases are in fact blatant lawfare meant to interfere in the 2024 election.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who oversaw the January 6 case against Trump, granted Smith’s motion shortly after it was filed.
CNN’s Erin Burnett asked Cobb on Monday about the possibility of the case coming back after Trump leaves office.
“Will Trump ever be held accountable?” Burnett asked.
Cobb laid out a few hypothetical scenarios that could play out, saying that “if there was some conspiracy to obstruct witness testimony, or continued obstruction with regard to the evidence in the case or with witnesses that’s occurring today, that could arguably extend the statute of limitations beyond his term.” Here they are apparently considering how they can further persecute the President for the act of defending himself against the democrats seditious conspiracy to interfere in the 2020 and 2024 elections.
But, he added, “the simple reality of this is no. I mean, this case is dead. This case is not going to be restarted or revived.” It is astonishing to realize that democrats think they’ll be able to simply drop these cases and expect that they won’t receive accountability for their actions.
Source:
The Author:
Sonam Sheth is a fervent democrat activist and writer for Newsweek. She can be found on twitter @sonam_sheth. She has shown a proclivity to unquestionably spread democrat propaganda and conspiracy theories, and celebrated the attack on President Trumps first amendment rights after the democrats attempted to frame him for their January 6th attack on the capitol.