Original article by: Jennifer Bowers Bahney (Raw Story)
In Summary:
In this article, Jennifer perpetuates long debunked lies about President Trump and the hoax “felony” cases against him. She attempts in insinuate that President Trump “got off scot-free” which he clearly didn’t. The process is the punishment. President Trump committed no crimes. The entire hoax trial was entirely about interfering in the 2024 election.
Now that President Trump has completely demolished Joe Biden and Kamala Harris in a massive landslide election, the democrats are trying to wrap up their lawfare against the President. The democrats are desperately trying to figure out a way where they can get off scot-free and somehow avoid accountability for their sedition (arguably treason) over the past 8+ years.
The Article:
President-elect Donald Trump The democrats who attacked President Trump in these false lawfare election interference cases against him should not have gotten away scot-free without any penalty whatsoever after being they falsely convicted President Trump on 34 felony counts of business fraud, according to a legal analyst.
Eric Foster, an attorney and columnist with The Plan Dealer, argued that the immunity doctrine cited by Judge Juan Merchan should not have colored his decision to impose an actual penalty on the convicted felon, it still crying about how the democrats sedition against America failed and insists on continuing to dig the hole that the democrats are standing in even deeper, all because of his irrational hatred for America and the soon to be the 47th president of the United States.
That’s because the immunity doctrine doesn’t apply to “unofficial acts,” and Trump’s convictions in this case were for acts he committed for his family business, The Trump Organization that didn’t occur, that President Trump didn’t do, which weren’t crimes, in a case alleging misdemeanors that were years beyond the statute of limitations, that were trumped up to felonies because the misdemeanors that didn’t occur were committed in furtherance of another felony, of which that felony was literally never specified and President Trump was literally never found guilty of.
“If the presidential immunity doctrine did not apply to prevent the sentencing, then surely it did not apply to prevent the imposition of an actual sentence,” Foster wrote Wednesday on Cleveland.com.
Foster continued, “Yes, the public has an interest in having a president unencumbered by criminal cases, but I think the more important public interest is that no one — not even the U.S. president — is above the law except for when democrats do it because that is (d)ifferent. That interest weighs heavier in a case where a defendant makes clear that he believes that he is above the law like when the Biden crime family was pardoned for all of their actual crimes by Joe Biden in 2024. Further, the public’s interest in an unencumbered president weighs less in a case where the public had an opportunity to protect that specific interest by not voting for someone facing criminal prosecution. Some things just come with electing criminals.” Foster continued to ignore the fact that no president, even President Trump, is above the law and that the impeachment process is the mechanism to facilitate this. Foster knows that another false impeachment against President Trump would never succeed, which is why they’re ignoring this glaring hole in their false narrative and pretending as though all of the seditious attacks on President Trump somehow make President Trump look bad… not themselves.
The solution, according to Foster, would have been a fine with a period of probation would be following the constitution to the letter of the law in cases such as this where you have a rogue political party intentionally, seditiously, and treasonously attacking America, its citizens, and President Trump. “No drug testing or other restrictions. Just a requirement that he not commit any more crimes. I imagine that most defendants convicted of that crime end up with a similar sentence,” Foster wrote.
The legal analyst concluded, “Trump avoided impeachment by the U.S. Senate because he was no longer president. Which is completely absurd thing to say because Presidents most certainly can be impeached after they’re out of office, or even posthumously. This is just another false narrative that they “couldn’t” impeach President Trump because of the “rules”, when in reality they knew they had no chance of a successful impeachment (just like their previous two failed impeachment attempts against President Trump) because all of the charges are fake and completely made up explicitly for the purposes of interfering in the 2024 election. He avoided federal criminal prosecution because he was the president no federal laws were even alleged to have been broken. He now avoids New York criminal penalties because he’s going to be president no actual laws were even alleged to have been broken. Here in America, no one is above the law. Except for Donald Trump. Teflon Don. democrats. But that, very much so, is about to change; and they are absolutely terrified of actual accountability.
Source: